+ + +
Brother Martin has a word for you this Pentecost.
It’s quite the curious irony that neo-antinomians (guys like Chad Bird, Donavon Riley, Daniel Price, and others) concur with the papists in a false estimation of the Lutheran faith. How so? Both groups believe that Martin Luther was an antinomian. This wish they project in common. The neo-antinomians— deeply sick men, all— celebrate this lie, for, quite perversely, their hope hangs upon it. The papists, whose hope hangs upon their works, decry the putatively antinomian Lutheranism, gnash their teeth, and shake their heads: “See! This is what lies at the heart of Luther’s revolt! This is why salvation can’t be by grace alone through faith alone!”
But the neo-antinomians and the papists are both wrong.
We’ve been poor Pentecost preachers (and hearers) for almost three quarters of a century now, Lutherans. Let’s make a clean break.
A blessed, holy Pentecost to you all.
O God, who didst teach the hearts of Thy faithful people by sending to them the light of Thy Holy Spirit, grant us by the same Spirit to have a right judgment in all things and evermore to rejoice in His holy comfort; through Jesus Christ, Thy Son, our Lord, who with Thee and the Holy Ghost liveth and reigneth ever One God, world without end.
That is what my Antinomians, too, are doing today, who are preaching beautifully and (as I cannot but think) with real sincerity about Christ’s grace, about the forgiveness of sin and whatever else can be said about the doctrine of redemption. But they flee as if it were the very devil the consequence that they should tell the people about the third article, of sanctification, that is, of the new life in Christ. They think one should not frighten or trouble the people, but rather always preach comfortingly about grace and the forgiveness of sins in Christ, and under no circumstances use these or similar words, “Listen! You want to be a Christian and at the same time remain an adulterer, a whoremonger, a drunken swine, arrogant, covetous, a usurer, envious, vindictive, malicious, etc.!” Instead they say, “Listen! Though you are an adulterer, a whoremonger, a miser, or other kind of sinner, if you but believe, you are saved, and you need not fear the law. Christ has fulfilled it all!”
Tell me, my dear man, is that not granting the premise and denying the conclusion? It is, indeed, taking away Christ and bringing him to nought at the same time he is most beautifully proclaimed! And it is saying yes and no to the same thing. For there is no such Christ that died for sinners who do not, after the forgiveness of sins, desist from sins and lead a new life. Thus they preach Christ nicely with Nestorian and Eutychian logic that Christ is and yet is not Christ. They may be fine Easter preachers, but they are very poor Pentecost preachers, for they do not preach de sanctificatione et vivificatione Spiritus Sancti, “about the sanctification by the Holy Spirit,” but solely about the redemption of Jesus Christ, although Christ (whom they extoll so highly, and rightly so) is Christ, that is, he has purchased redemption from sin and death so that the Holy Spirit might transform us out of the old Adam into new men— we die unto sin and live unto righteousness, beginning and growing here on earth and perfecting it beyond, as St. Paul teaches. Christ did not earn only gratia, “grace,” for us, but also donum, “the gift of the Holy Spirit,” so that we might have not only forgiveness of, but also cessation of, sin. Now he who does not abstain from sin, but persists in his evil life, must have a different Christ, that of the Antinomians; the real Christ is not there, even if all the angels would cry, “Christi! Christi!” He must be damned with this, his new Christ.
Now see what evil logicians we are in sublime matters that are so far beyond or remote from us that we simultaneously believe and disbelieve something. But in lowly matters we are exceedingly keen logicians. No matter how stupid a peasant is, he soon understands and figures out this: he who gives me a groschen is not giving me a gulden. This follows as a matter of course, and he sees the logic of it clearly. But our Antinomians fail to see that they are preaching Christ without and against the Holy Spirit because they propose to let the people continue in their old ways and still pronounce them saved. And yet logic, too, implies that a Christian should either have the Holy Spirit and lead a new life, or know that he has no Christ. Nevertheless, these asses presume to be better logicians than Master Philip and Aristotle— I must not mention Luther because the pope was made to feel only their logic— they soar far too high for me! Well, then, the logic of Nestorius and Eutyches is a common plague, especially with reference to Holy Scripture; but in other matters it acquits itself better, although it plagues jurists and rulers enough in subtle matters, where they have to hear a yes and no at the same time and have difficulty in distinguishing the two.
(Blessed Martin Luther, On The Councils And The Church; AE 41:114-116)
- Various and sundry bits from Luther’s Works on the Law, antinomianism, etc.
- Two Bombshell Sermons from Luther: Trinity 18 & 19
- “When will the Gospel Drop?” A brief reflection on Lutheran preaching clichés.
- “Afterwards we add also the doctrine of the Law”— The Lutheran Confessions said what?
- “The Gospel frees us to fulfill the Law” is a thoroughly Christian statement
- Walther: “if Christ did no more with sin but forgive it, He would not be a perfect Savior.”